<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mother West Wind&#039;s Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mossyskull.com/hm/mother-west-winds-children/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mossyskull.com/hm/mother-west-winds-children</link>
	<description>Ramblings of Michael J. DeLuca</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:53:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjd</title>
		<link>http://mossyskull.com/hm/mother-west-winds-children/comment-page-1#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>mjd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjd.joskinandlob.com/wordpress/?p=363#comment-558</guid>
		<description>Wait---is this not the 25th anniversary edition that I&#039;m reading now? It says the Harper Perennial Modern Classics edition was published in 2006....and there&#039;s this website I found:
http://www.littlebig25.com/
where it says you can pay absurd sums for a super special collectors edition.

Anyway. Yes. It is a positively monumental book. And I wish I had read it earlier. Maybe this way I&#039;m getting a better chance to appreciate the nuance of his style, but on the other hand, like Smoky Barnable, I&#039;m missing out on the opportunity to be a kid and believe in fairies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait&#8212;is this not the 25th anniversary edition that I&#8217;m reading now? It says the Harper Perennial Modern Classics edition was published in 2006&#8230;.and there&#8217;s this website I found:<br />
<a href="http://www.littlebig25.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.littlebig25.com/</a><br />
where it says you can pay absurd sums for a super special collectors edition.</p>
<p>Anyway. Yes. It is a positively monumental book. And I wish I had read it earlier. Maybe this way I&#8217;m getting a better chance to appreciate the nuance of his style, but on the other hand, like Smoky Barnable, I&#8217;m missing out on the opportunity to be a kid and believe in fairies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Smith</title>
		<link>http://mossyskull.com/hm/mother-west-winds-children/comment-page-1#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjd.joskinandlob.com/wordpress/?p=363#comment-557</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Little, Big&lt;/i&gt;.

The first time I read it was in 1991, introduced to it by a Pre-Raphaelite dream of a boy who willo&#039;-the-wisped through my life in the space of a month.  Although we touched each other&#039;s lives only briefly, Crowley&#039;s book wove its way through our brief cosmic romance.

I recommended it to people (helps when you work in a bookstore), eventually coming to realize that it&#039;s not something that suits everyone, and it was out of print for a long time.  When I met my now closest friend in 1996, we were two of the only people that we knew of at the time who had read it, causing an instant bond between us.  Then I found out that John Crowley lives, well, where he lives, and that her mom had typed the manuscript for &lt;i&gt;Aegypt&lt;/i&gt; a few years before &lt;i&gt;Little, Big&lt;/i&gt; came out.  Then more years went by and I re-read it (um, three times in a row) about 3 winters ago, and I really wondered what I&#039;d read the first time, because there were things I remembered that weren&#039;t in the book, and things in the book--major parts of the plot--that I completely didn&#039;t remember, which makes me highly suspicious of what actually is going on in my head and/or what this book actually is, and covetous of the 25th anniversary edition, if it ever comes out.

And, finally, to bring this back to earth again, I went to see John Crowley (and Elizabeth Hand) read at that reading you mentioned, and I heard you read, too, then looked you up, found out you had a blog, and that, in a roundabout way, is why I&#039;m posting a comment now, isn&#039;t it?  Heh.

There are lots of books I love, but &lt;i&gt;Little, Big&lt;/i&gt; has actually been less like a book and more like a touchstone, or an event, or the sky.

I feel all funny and weird now, like part of my brain has gone to live someplace else for awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Little, Big</i>.</p>
<p>The first time I read it was in 1991, introduced to it by a Pre-Raphaelite dream of a boy who willo&#8217;-the-wisped through my life in the space of a month.  Although we touched each other&#8217;s lives only briefly, Crowley&#8217;s book wove its way through our brief cosmic romance.</p>
<p>I recommended it to people (helps when you work in a bookstore), eventually coming to realize that it&#8217;s not something that suits everyone, and it was out of print for a long time.  When I met my now closest friend in 1996, we were two of the only people that we knew of at the time who had read it, causing an instant bond between us.  Then I found out that John Crowley lives, well, where he lives, and that her mom had typed the manuscript for <i>Aegypt</i> a few years before <i>Little, Big</i> came out.  Then more years went by and I re-read it (um, three times in a row) about 3 winters ago, and I really wondered what I&#8217;d read the first time, because there were things I remembered that weren&#8217;t in the book, and things in the book&#8211;major parts of the plot&#8211;that I completely didn&#8217;t remember, which makes me highly suspicious of what actually is going on in my head and/or what this book actually is, and covetous of the 25th anniversary edition, if it ever comes out.</p>
<p>And, finally, to bring this back to earth again, I went to see John Crowley (and Elizabeth Hand) read at that reading you mentioned, and I heard you read, too, then looked you up, found out you had a blog, and that, in a roundabout way, is why I&#8217;m posting a comment now, isn&#8217;t it?  Heh.</p>
<p>There are lots of books I love, but <i>Little, Big</i> has actually been less like a book and more like a touchstone, or an event, or the sky.</p>
<p>I feel all funny and weird now, like part of my brain has gone to live someplace else for awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
